-
Join 481 other subscribers
RSS Subscription
-
Recent Posts
- Singapore Court of Appeal affirms strict adherence to defined scope of remission of arbitral awards in cases where set aside applications have been suspended (CKH v CKG [2022] SGCA(I) 6)
- Singapore Court of Appeal clarifies grounds for setting aside arbitral awards and applicability of ‘no evidence rule’ in Singapore (CEF and CEG v CEH)
- SGCA exercises inherent power to set aside judgment enforcing arbitral award and order return of sums paid out
- Conditional Fee Agreements Regime in Singapore – Liberalisation of Singapore’s Legal Landscape and Lessons Learned from Other Jurisdictions
- Singapore High Court rejects creative arguments to seek de novo appeal on merits of arbitral award via setting aside applications (BTN v BTP)
Archives
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- December 2021
- October 2021
- July 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- June 2020
- April 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- August 2019
- February 2019
- December 2018
- July 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- September 2017
- July 2017
- April 2017
- February 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- September 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- March 2016
- July 2015
- June 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- October 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
Arbitration Rules
Blogroll
Useful Links
- Holborn Law
- IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration
- IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration
- International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)
- LCIA India
- Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC)
- The London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA)
- WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Centre
Category Archives: Indonesia
Arbitration under SIAC Expedited Procedure not contrary to arbitration clause providing for 3 Arbitrators
In the recent case of AQZ v ARA, [2015] SGHC 49, the Singapore High Court had to consider a challenge to an SIAC award which was rendered pursuant to the SIAC’s expedited procedure under the SIAC Rules 2010. The High … Continue reading
Challenge to Arbitrator for Apparent Bias – What happens if the final award is rendered before the court determines challenge?
The recent Singapore High Court decision of PT Central Investindo v Franciscus Wongso and others and another matter, [2014] SGHC 190 involved a rare challenge to an arbitrator for apparent bias. The case also addressed a novel legal issue: what would happen when a party seeks to disqualify and remove a sole arbitrator, but that sole arbitrator the renders her/his final award before the courts determine the removal application? Continue reading
Posted in Arbitration, Indonesia, Singapore
Tagged Astro, breach of natural justice, case law, Model Law, public policy, Singapore High Court
3 Comments
Singapore Law Gazette – Arbitration in Singapore 2013: A Year in Review
We are pleased to announce that the Singapore Law Gazette has just published an exclusive article that we recently wrote for them. The article Arbitration in Singapore 2013: A Year in Review is now available online. As we enter 2014, … Continue reading
Posted in Arbitration, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, UK
Tagged alternative dispute resolution, arbitration, arbitration in Singapore, Astro, case law, governing law, Lippo, proper law, setting aside, Singapore Court, singapore court of appeal, Singapore High Court, Singapore Law Gazette
Leave a comment
Astro v Lippo update: Singapore Court of Appeal allows PT First Media’s appeal
The Singapore Court of Appeal has just issued its written judgment allowing PT First Media’s appeal to the extent that it has refused Astro leave to enforce the Awards in both OS 807/2010 and OS 913/2010 in relation to the … Continue reading
Posted in Arbitration, Asean, Indonesia, Singapore
Tagged Astro, award, david joseph, enforcement, indonesia, Lippo, Model Law, new york convention, singapore, toby landau, UNCITRAL
Leave a comment
Update on Astro-Lippo Dispute: Astro’s appeal to Indonesian Supreme Court fails
Our readers would be aware that we have written a fair bit on the Astro-Lippo dispute, including the background of the dispute, what the dispute tells us about enforcement in arbitration as well as the parties’ skirmishes before the Hong … Continue reading
News Update: Astro-Lippo Dispute (Antisuit Injunction)
Followers of this blog would know that we have written a fair bit on the Astro-Lippo dispute which resulted in 5 SIAC awards rendered in favour of the Astro group against the Lippo group. This includes an overview of the … Continue reading
Orders / directions of arbitral tribunal not liable to be set aside as if they are arbitral awards
The Singapore High Court has recently reaffirmed the substance/procedure distinction for the purposes of categorising arbitral orders and arbitral awards. The High Court held that an order is not liable to be challenged and set aside as if it were … Continue reading
State Immunity and the Commercial Activity Exception in Australia
In a previous post, we discussed a recent decision of the UK Supreme Court, SerVaas Incorporated v Rafidian Bank & Ors [2012] UKSC 40 which considered the meaning of the expression “property which is for the time being in use … Continue reading
Posted in Asean, Indonesia
Tagged ACCC, Australia, competition law, Garuda, sovereign immunity, state immunity, state owned enterprises
1 Comment
Singapore International Arbitration Blog 