RSS Subscription
-
Recent Posts
- Singapore – standard costs to be awarded by default for failed award set-aside applications (BTN v BTP)
- Amendments to Singapore’s International Arbitration Act to Enhance Statutory Regime
- Singapore – Court of Appeal considers doctrine of res judicata in clarification of public policy ground for setting aside awards (BTN v BTP)
- Rights of representation in international arbitration: are you being heard?
- Arbitration Clause in Settlement Agreement Triggers a Stay of Court Proceedings on Case Management Grounds
Archives
- March 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- June 2020
- April 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- August 2019
- February 2019
- December 2018
- July 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- September 2017
- July 2017
- April 2017
- February 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- September 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- March 2016
- July 2015
- June 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- October 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
Arbitration Rules
Blogroll
Useful Links
- Holborn Law
- IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration
- IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration
- International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)
- LCIA India
- Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC)
- The London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA)
- WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Centre
Tag Archives: public policy
Challenge to Arbitrator for Apparent Bias – What happens if the final award is rendered before the court determines challenge?
The recent Singapore High Court decision of PT Central Investindo v Franciscus Wongso and others and another matter, [2014] SGHC 190 involved a rare challenge to an arbitrator for apparent bias. The case also addressed a novel legal issue: what would happen when a party seeks to disqualify and remove a sole arbitrator, but that sole arbitrator the renders her/his final award before the courts determine the removal application? Continue reading
Posted in Arbitration, Indonesia, Singapore
Tagged Astro, breach of natural justice, case law, Model Law, public policy, Singapore High Court
3 Comments
Indian Supreme Court Overrules its previous case of Bhatia International
The Indian Supreme Court has just delivered its long awaited decision in Bharat Aluminium Co v Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services Inc, Civil Appeal No. 7019 of 2005. This case is significant in overruling its earlier decision of Bhatia International v … Continue reading
Delhi High Court – Error of Fact constitutes Patent Illegality
Introduction One of the foundations of arbitration is that awards rendered are final and not subject to appeal before the courts. In this respect, Article 5 of the UNCITRAL Model Law provides for minimal curial intervention, stipulating that “[i]n matters … Continue reading
