RSS Subscription
-
Recent Posts
- SGCA RECOGNISES ASYMMETRIC ARBITRATION CLAUSE GIVING ONLY ONE PARTY RIGHT TO ELECT TO ARBITRATE
- Updates on Third Party Funding in Singapore and developments in Mediation
- SINGAPORE HIGH COURT REFUSES TO ADMIT INDIAN SENIOR ADVOCATE TO ARGUE SETTING ASIDE APPLICATIONS
- ENGLISH HIGH COURT CONFIRMS RIGHTS TO A CLAIM IN ARBITRATION CAN BE TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER WHILE AN ARBITRATION IS ON-GOING
- RECENT ARBITRATION DEVELOPMENTS IN MAINLAND CHINA: TOWARDS A MORE INCLUSIVE APPROACH TO FOREIGN-SEATED ARBITRATIONS
Archives
- July 2017
- April 2017
- February 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- September 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- March 2016
- July 2015
- June 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- October 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
Arbitration Rules
Blogroll
Useful Links
- Holborn Law
- IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration
- IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration
- International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)
- LCIA India
- Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC)
- The London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA)
- WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Centre
Category Archives: Arbitration
SGCA RECOGNISES ASYMMETRIC ARBITRATION CLAUSE GIVING ONLY ONE PARTY RIGHT TO ELECT TO ARBITRATE
Introduction Is a dispute resolution clause that gives only one party the right to elect to arbitrate a dispute a valid arbitration agreement? The Singapore Court of Appeal (the “Court”) answered this question in the affirmative recently in Wilson Taylor … Continue reading
Posted in Arbitration, Dispute Resolution, Singapore
Leave a comment
Updates on Third Party Funding in Singapore and developments in Mediation
Third Party Funding We covered the key proposed changes under the Civil Law (Amendment) Bill 2016 (“Funding Bill“) in our earlier post, which provides a framework for third party funding in Singapore. It will currently apply to international arbitration proceedings … Continue reading
SINGAPORE HIGH COURT REFUSES TO ADMIT INDIAN SENIOR ADVOCATE TO ARGUE SETTING ASIDE APPLICATIONS
The Singapore High Court recently dismissed the applications made on behalf of Mr Harish Salve (the “Applicant“), a Senior Advocate of the India Bar, to be admitted to represent 20 plaintiffs (the “Sellers“) in their application(s) before the Singapore High … Continue reading
Posted in Arbitration
Leave a comment
ENGLISH HIGH COURT CONFIRMS RIGHTS TO A CLAIM IN ARBITRATION CAN BE TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER WHILE AN ARBITRATION IS ON-GOING
by Tom Pritchard In November 2016, the English High Court was asked to rule on an arbitral tribunal’s jurisdiction after it made an award in favour of a claimant that had undergone a corporate restructuring halfway through the arbitration (A … Continue reading
Posted in Arbitration, India, UK
Leave a comment
RECENT ARBITRATION DEVELOPMENTS IN MAINLAND CHINA: TOWARDS A MORE INCLUSIVE APPROACH TO FOREIGN-SEATED ARBITRATIONS
The SPC Opinion On 30 December 2016, the Chinese Supreme People’s Court (“SPC“) issued its Opinions on the Provision of Judicial Safeguards for the Construction of Pilot Free Trade Zones (“SPC Opinion“). Article 9 of the SPC Opinion provides, among … Continue reading
Posted in Arbitration
Leave a comment
Joint Seminar on The Arb-Med-Arb Protocol: The Future of Alternative Dispute Resolution? (10 January 2017, Jakarta, Indonesia)
We are delighted to host a panel discussion on The Arb-Med-Arb Protocol: The Future of Alternative Dispute Resolution? alongside the Singapore International Mediation Centre (SIMC) and Pusat Mediasi Nasional (the Indonesian Mediation Center) (PMN) on 10 January 2017, 5 pm – 6.30 … Continue reading
Posted in Arbitration
Leave a comment
AMENDMENTS TO THE ICC RULES OF ARBITRATION: AUTOMATIC EXPEDITED ARBITRATION PROCESS FOR CLAIMS WORTH LESS THAN US $2 MILLION
by Mark Davison and Katherine McKenna On 20 October 2016, the ICC Executive Board approved changes to their Rules which will be effective as of 1 March 2017.[1] Within the amended rules, the ICC has followed other arbitration centres such as … Continue reading
Posted in Arbitration
Leave a comment
THE FUTURE OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN THE TMT SECTOR: VIEWS ON QMUL’S 2016 INTERNATIONAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION SURVEY
The Queen Mary University of London (“QMUL“) recently released its International Dispute Resolution Survey relating to Technology, Media and Telecoms (“TMT“) disputes. The comprehensive survey was conducted over 2 phases and involved a variety of respondents, including private practitioners, in-house … Continue reading
Posted in Arbitration, TMT
1 Comment
THIRD PARTY FUNDING – A STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION FOR SINGAPORE?
Over the past few years, companies have begin to view Singapore as an attractive regional business hub as evident by the increase in the number of global companies who have decided to set up and/or relocate their Asia headquarters to … Continue reading
Posted in Arbitration, Hong Kong, Singapore, UK
Leave a comment
COSTS AND DURATION OF ARBITRATIONS: A COMPARISON OF THE SIAC AND LCIA STUDIES
The SIAC Study On 10 October 2016, the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (“SIAC“) released its inaugural Costs and Duration Study (the “SIAC Study“) based on actual cases filed with the SIAC under the 5th edition of the SIAC Rules (“SIAC … Continue reading
Posted in Arbitration, LCIA, SIAC
Leave a comment
