Tag Archives: Garuda

State Immunity and the Commercial Activity Exception in Australia

In a previous post, we discussed a recent decision of the UK Supreme Court, SerVaas Incorporated v Rafidian Bank & Ors [2012] UKSC 40 which considered the meaning of the expression “property which is for the time being in use … Continue reading

Posted in Asean, Indonesia | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment