-
Join 481 other subscribers
RSS Subscription
-
Recent Posts
- Singapore Court of Appeal affirms strict adherence to defined scope of remission of arbitral awards in cases where set aside applications have been suspended (CKH v CKG [2022] SGCA(I) 6)
- Singapore Court of Appeal clarifies grounds for setting aside arbitral awards and applicability of ‘no evidence rule’ in Singapore (CEF and CEG v CEH)
- SGCA exercises inherent power to set aside judgment enforcing arbitral award and order return of sums paid out
- Conditional Fee Agreements Regime in Singapore – Liberalisation of Singapore’s Legal Landscape and Lessons Learned from Other Jurisdictions
- Singapore High Court rejects creative arguments to seek de novo appeal on merits of arbitral award via setting aside applications (BTN v BTP)
Archives
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- December 2021
- October 2021
- July 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- June 2020
- April 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- August 2019
- February 2019
- December 2018
- July 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- September 2017
- July 2017
- April 2017
- February 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- September 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- March 2016
- July 2015
- June 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- October 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
Arbitration Rules
Blogroll
Useful Links
- Holborn Law
- IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration
- IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration
- International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)
- LCIA India
- Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC)
- The London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA)
- WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Centre
Tag Archives: ICC Rules
Olswang’s Head of International Arbitration to become member of the ICC Commission on Arbitration
We would like to offer our congratulations to London partner and Head of International Arbitration at Olswang Andrew Aglionby who has been invited to join, as a member, the ICC Commission on Arbitration (the “Commission“).
Posted in Arbitration, UK
Tagged Andrew Aglionby, ICC, ICC Commission on Arbitration, ICC Rules
Leave a comment
HKL v Rizq International: Pathological Arbitration Clause Case Update
In a previous post, we discussed the case of HKL Group Co Ltd v Rizq International Holdings Pte Ltd, [2013] SGHCR 5 (“HKL v Rizq (No. 1)“), which upheld a pathological arbitration clause as a hybrid arbitration clause and which appeared … Continue reading
Case Update: Singapore High Court gives effect to pathological arbitration clause
We have mentioned elsewhere that managing disputes starts at the drafting stage. In particular, an arbitration clause should be drafted properly in order to avoid a jurisdiction fight before the substantive one. The recent Singapore High Court case of HKL … Continue reading
The Secretariat’s Guide to ICC Arbitration – Guidance to the 2012 ICC Rules
The 2012 amendments to the ICC Rules of Arbitration (“ICC Rules 2012“) came into effect on 1 January 2012 and essentially codify the best practices that have been developed by the ICC Secretariat over the years. One notable change involves … Continue reading
Reference to ICC Rules sufficient to exclude Right of Appeal
Singapore‘s dual arbitration regime Singapore has a dual arbitration regime with the Singapore Arbitration Act (Cap. 10) governing domestic arbitrations and the Singapore International Arbitration Act (Cap. 143A) governing international arbitrations whether seated in Singapore or abroad. There are a … Continue reading
Error of Law / Erroneous Application of choice of law clause not grounds to set aside award – Quarella v Scelta Marble
The Singapore High Court has once again dismissed an attempt to set aside an arbitration award, this time on the purported basis that the arbitrator had wrongly interpreted the choice of law clause which parties had chosen to govern their … Continue reading
Failure to specify number of arbitrators results in default number
This might seem like an obvious proposition. However, what happens when an arbitration clause makes reference to arbitrators in the plural without specifying the exact number to constitute the tribunal? And what happens when in that situation, the default position … Continue reading
IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration
Nemo iudex in causa sua – no one should be a judge in their own cause. This precept would appear to be universal in all formal systems of law. In international arbitration, most arbitration rules (and certainly all the major … Continue reading
Posted in Arbitration, Asean, China, India, Singapore
Tagged arbitration, challenge to arbitrator, conflict of interests, disclosure, IBA Guidelines, IBA Guidelines on Conflict of Interests, ICC Rules, LCIA Rules, Model Law, SIAC Rules, singapore arbitration, singapore international arbitration
1 Comment
Singapore International Arbitration Blog 