-
Join 481 other subscribers
RSS Subscription
-
Recent Posts
- Singapore Court of Appeal affirms strict adherence to defined scope of remission of arbitral awards in cases where set aside applications have been suspended (CKH v CKG [2022] SGCA(I) 6)
- Singapore Court of Appeal clarifies grounds for setting aside arbitral awards and applicability of ‘no evidence rule’ in Singapore (CEF and CEG v CEH)
- SGCA exercises inherent power to set aside judgment enforcing arbitral award and order return of sums paid out
- Conditional Fee Agreements Regime in Singapore – Liberalisation of Singapore’s Legal Landscape and Lessons Learned from Other Jurisdictions
- Singapore High Court rejects creative arguments to seek de novo appeal on merits of arbitral award via setting aside applications (BTN v BTP)
Archives
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- December 2021
- October 2021
- July 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- June 2020
- April 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- August 2019
- February 2019
- December 2018
- July 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- September 2017
- July 2017
- April 2017
- February 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- September 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- March 2016
- July 2015
- June 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- October 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
Arbitration Rules
Blogroll
Useful Links
- Holborn Law
- IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration
- IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration
- International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)
- LCIA India
- Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC)
- The London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA)
- WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Centre
Tag Archives: disclosure
IBA Guidelines on Party Representation
The IBA Guidelines on Party Representation in International Arbitration (“IBA Guidelines on Party Representation“), which were recently adopted by a resolution of the International Bar Association (IBA) Council on 25 May 2013, seek to address some of the uncertainties which … Continue reading
Case Update: Accountants not entitled to assert legal advice privilege
In a previous post, we discussed the case of Walter Lilly & Company Ltd v Mackay & Anor [2012] EWHC 649 (TCC) in which the English High Court held that advice by a claims consultant is not protected by legal professional / … Continue reading
IBA Rules – Failure to Produce Documents in a Singapore International Arbitration
We considered the IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration (the “IBA Rules“) in a previous post. The Singapore case of Dongwoo Mann+Hummel Co Ltd v Mann+Hummel GmbH [2008] 3 SLR(R) 871; [2008] SGHC 67 demonstrates how a tribunal may … Continue reading
IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration
Nemo iudex in causa sua – no one should be a judge in their own cause. This precept would appear to be universal in all formal systems of law. In international arbitration, most arbitration rules (and certainly all the major … Continue reading
Posted in Arbitration, Asean, China, India, Singapore
Tagged arbitration, challenge to arbitrator, conflict of interests, disclosure, IBA Guidelines, IBA Guidelines on Conflict of Interests, ICC Rules, LCIA Rules, Model Law, SIAC Rules, singapore arbitration, singapore international arbitration
1 Comment
IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration
Discovery (and e-discovery) in modern litigation can be a very expensive endeavour. In the case of Digicel (St. Lucia) Ltd & Ors v Cable & Wireless Plc & Ors [2008] EWHC 2522 (Ch), the initial exercise undertaken by the defendants’ solicitors … Continue reading
Advice by Claims Consultant not protected by Legal Professional / Advice Privilege
A recent English High Court decision in the case of Walter Lilly & Company Ltd v Mackay & Anor [2012] EWHC 649 (TCC), has reaffirmed the proposition that legal professional privilege does not apply, at common law, in relation to any … Continue reading
Singapore International Arbitration Blog 