RSS Subscription
-
Recent Posts
- Singapore High Court rejects application to adjourn enforcement of foreign arbitral award
- Another record-breaking year for the Singapore International Arbitration Centre
- Costs and Duration: A Comparison of the HKIAC, LCIA, SCC and SIAC Studies
- SGCA grants Senior Indian Advocate ad hoc admission to argue arbitration-related applications
- Singapore passes bill for Singapore International Commercial Court to hear arbitration-related matters
Archives
- July 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- September 2017
- July 2017
- April 2017
- February 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- September 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- March 2016
- July 2015
- June 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- October 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
Arbitration Rules
Blogroll
Useful Links
- Holborn Law
- IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration
- IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration
- International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)
- LCIA India
- Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC)
- The London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA)
- WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Centre
Tag Archives: CIETAC Arbitration Rules 2012
Arbitration News Update – CIETAC terminates its authorisation to Shanghai and South China Sub-commissions
CIETAC has just fired its latest salvo against its breakaway sub-commissions in Shanghai and South China (Shenzhen). The background to this dispute is explored in greater detail in a previous post. On 1 May 2012, the Shanghai Sub-commission announced its … Continue reading →
Arbitration News Update – (1) CIETAC Announcement on Shanghai and South China breakaway Sub-commissions; and (2) Joint Response by CIETAC Shanghai and South China
Arbitration agreements in respect of arbitrations seated in China (whether a domestic arbitration or a so-called foreign-related arbitration i.e. an arbitration in China with foreign elements) are required to stipulate the arbitration institution that will administer the arbitration. Failing to … Continue reading →
