-
Join 481 other subscribers
RSS Subscription
-
Recent Posts
- Singapore Court of Appeal affirms strict adherence to defined scope of remission of arbitral awards in cases where set aside applications have been suspended (CKH v CKG [2022] SGCA(I) 6)
- Singapore Court of Appeal clarifies grounds for setting aside arbitral awards and applicability of ‘no evidence rule’ in Singapore (CEF and CEG v CEH)
- SGCA exercises inherent power to set aside judgment enforcing arbitral award and order return of sums paid out
- Conditional Fee Agreements Regime in Singapore – Liberalisation of Singapore’s Legal Landscape and Lessons Learned from Other Jurisdictions
- Singapore High Court rejects creative arguments to seek de novo appeal on merits of arbitral award via setting aside applications (BTN v BTP)
Archives
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- December 2021
- October 2021
- July 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- June 2020
- April 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- August 2019
- February 2019
- December 2018
- July 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- September 2017
- July 2017
- April 2017
- February 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- September 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- March 2016
- July 2015
- June 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- October 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
Arbitration Rules
Blogroll
Useful Links
- Holborn Law
- IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration
- IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration
- International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)
- LCIA India
- Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC)
- The London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA)
- WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Centre
Tag Archives: technology and outsourcing hot spots
Medirest Case Update: English Court of Appeal narrows obligation to cooperate in good faith
We previously discussed the case of Compass Group UK and Ireland Ltd (t/a Medirest) v Mid Essex Hospital Services NHS Trust, [2012] EWHC 781 (QB) as part of our Technology and Outsourcing Hot Spots series. In particular, we highlighted the case … Continue reading
Our Article at Korean Arbitration Review
We are pleased to announced that our article on Technology and Outsourcing Hot Spots has been published in the second edition of the Korean Arbitration Review (“KAR“). The KAR is published by the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board (“KCAB“), which is … Continue reading
Technology and Outsourcing Hot Spots Series (3): Termination and Post-termination rights
Earlier in this series, we examined issues arising out of pre-contractual negotiations as well as governance and change control mechanisms. Invariably, all contracts come to an end, whether because (a) parties have fallen out and can no longer cooperate with … Continue reading
Posted in Asean, UK
Tagged alternative dispute resolution, case law, contractual negotiations, exit provisions, hot spots series, ICT, infocomms, migration assistance, outsourcing, outsourcing contracts, post termination rights, technology, technology and outsourcing hot spots, technology arbitration, termination
1 Comment
Technology and Outsourcing Hot Spots (2): Governances and Change Control Procedures
Part 2 of our ongoing Technology and Outsourcing Hot Spots Series discusses issues relating to the performance of technology and outsourcing contracts. It examines governance and change issues including: Effective service descriptions; Effective cooperation between parties Variation orders and clauses; … Continue reading
Posted in Asean, China, India, Singapore, UK
Tagged agreement to negotiate, alternative dispute resolution, case law, contractual negotiations, governance, hot spots series, ICT, infocomms, long term relationship, outsourcing, outsourcing contracts, pre-contractual negotiations, software, technology, technology and outsourcing hot spots, technology arbitration, work scope
4 Comments
Technology and Outsourcing Hot Spots (1): Pre-Contractual Negotiations
Part 1 of our technology and outsourcing hot spots series discusses some of the more relevant issues relating to pre-project scoping and in particular: the need to be explicit in setting out the scope of work; issues of marketing puff; … Continue reading
Singapore International Arbitration Blog 