Singapore Law Watch Commentary

Our case update on an arbitration clause in the main agreement being an implied term in the settlement agreement has been picked up by Singapore Law Watch (“SLW“). Our SLW Commentary can be found here.

The SLW Commentary examines an English High Court decision which considers the situation in which a dispute between parties under a main contract is resolved pursuant to a settlement agreement, but then a subsequent dispute arises under the settlement agreement. In that situation, what happens when the main contract contains an arbitration clause, but the settlement agreement does not? Where an arbitration clause is an implied term in the settlement agreement, court proceedings taken out pursuant to that settlement agreement will be stayed in favour of arbitration. We also look at how the Singapore courts might approach this same issue and how the Singapore and English courts will reconcile an exclusive jurisdiction clause in favour of the courts alongside an arbitration clause in the same agreement.

About Shaun Lee

International Dispute Resolution and Arbitration lawyer. Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitration. Panel of Arbitrators and Panelist for DNDR at the KLRCA.
This entry was posted in Arbitration, UK and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s